Reference address : https://www.elpenor.org/athanasius/defence-nicene-definition.asp?pg=2

ELPENOR - Home of the Greek Word

Three Millennia of Greek Literature
ST ATHANASIUS THE GREAT HOME PAGE  

St Athanasius the Great DEFENCE OF THE NICENE DEFINITION, Complete

Translated by Cardinal Newman.

St Athanasius the Great Resources Online and in Print

ELPENOR EDITIONS IN PRINT

Icon of the Christ and New Testament Reader

39 Pages


Page 2

Introduction to de Decretis or Defence of the Nicene Definition.

This letter must have been written in the interval between the return of Athanasius in 346 and his flight in 356. Acacius was already (S:3) Bishop of Caesarea 339; Eusebius of Nicomedia is not referred to as though still living (he died 342). Moreover the language of S:2 ("for in no long time they will turn to outrage," &c.) implies a period of actual peace, but with a prospect of the repetition of the scenes of the year 339. This actually occurred in 356. Accordingly we must probably place the tract under the sole reign of Constantius, between 351 and the end of 355.

It is written in answer to a friend who in disputing with Arians had been posed by their objection to the use of non-scriptural terms in the Nicene Definition. He accordingly asks for some account of what the council had done.

Athanasius begins his answer by stigmatising the evasions and inconsistency of the Arianisers, and describing their conduct at the council, and how they eventually subscribed to the terms now complained of (1-5). He then investigates the meaning of the divine Sonship (6-14), and how its true meaning is brought out by the other titles of the Son (15-17). Coming to the non-scriptural expressions he shews how they were forced upon the council by the evasions of the Arians (18-20), and that they express no sense not to be found in Scripture (21-24). Moreover, they had already been in use in the Church, as is shewn by extracts from Theognostus, the two Dionysii, and Origen (25-27). Lastly (28-32) he discusses the term agenetos, applied by the Arians (especially Asterius) to the Father, in contrast, not to the creation, but to the Son, who is thereby implied to be genetos. He insists on 'Father' not 'agenetos' as the divine title authorised by Scripture. Lastly he appends, in proof of what he states in S:3, the letter of Eusebius to the people of Caesarea, containing the creed of the council, which, for reasons there stated, we have inserted above, pp. 73-76.

First Page ||| Next Page of Athanasius - DEFENCE OF THE NICENE DEFINITION
The Authentic Greek New Testament Bilingual New Testament I
St Athanasius the Great Home Page ||| More Church Fathers

Elpenor's Free Greek Lessons

Three Millennia of Greek Literature

 

Greek Literature - Ancient, Medieval, Modern

St Athanasius the Great Home Page   St Athanasius the Great in Print

Learned Freeware

Reference address : https://www.elpenor.org/athanasius/defence-nicene-definition.asp?pg=2